In recent years there has been a proliferation of nutrition screening tools but under nutrition remains prevalent amongst older subjects.
Screening tools commonly include BM1 as the widely-accepted ‘gold standard’ indicator of malnutrition. Whilst BM1 may be an appropriate tool for population studies when it can be measured accurately in research conditions, the use of BMl in clinical practice may mask important weight changes and result in a failure to alert healthcare staff to a nutritional problem.
The inclusion of BMl has been identified as a barrier to completing the screening process at ward level. Also, feedback from dieticians working with older subjects indicates that 72 % of those using BMl express concerns that it is of limited use for practical reasons or that the reference range (20-25 kg/m2) is not appropriate to older subjects.
Further evidence questions whether or not BMl is applicable for inclusion in methods used to identify an older subject at risk of undcr nutrition in a variety of care settings. In view of these findings it is advocated that weight change over a period of time together with clinical judgement is a far superior prognostic indicator of under nutrition.
Despite screening, there is evidence that inpatients continue to lose weight before discharge. Further experiential evidence from both community and ward settings suggests that inadequacies in care planning, food provision and a lack of assistance with feeding are common. In order to improve the management of under nutrition in older subjects it is therefore recommended that the focus of attention should be on addressing these practical issues and on the effective monitoring of these processes.
Cook et al 2005 Use of BMI in the assessment of undernutrtion in older subjectdd: reflecting on practice. Proceedings of the Nutriton Society vol 64 313-317
Undernutrition: BMl: Older subjects
- Martin Eastwood